Online Inquiry
  •  

Macrophage Chemokine Ligand 16 (CCL16) ELISA Kit, qPCR (MTS-1123-HM98)

Overview

Description
Creative Biolabs provides sandwich ELISA kit for semi-quantitative measurement of Chemokine Ligand 16 (CCL16) in different sample types by qPCR.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Reactivity
Human
Detection Method
qPCR
Method Type
Sandwich ELISA
Analytical Method
Semi-Quantitative
Sensitivity
0.8 pg/mL
Sample Type
Cell Culture Supernatant, Plasma, Serum
Specificity
Chemokine Ligand 16 (CCL16)

Specification

Size
96 tests
Sample Volume
25 µL
Plate
Pre-coated
Bioassay Target Name
Chemokine Ligand 16 (CCL16)
Storage
4 °C, -20 °C, -80 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Expiry Date
6 months
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.

Target Details

Full Name
C-C motif chemokine ligand 16
Synonyms
LEC; LMC; NCC4; CKb12; HCC-4; LCC-1; Mtn-1; NCC-4; SCYL4; ILINCK; SCYA16
Background
This gene is one of several cytokine genes clustered on the q-arm of chromosome 17. Cytokines are a family of secreted proteins involved in immunoregulatory and inflammatory processes. The CC cytokines are proteins characterized by two adjacent cysteines. The cytokine encoded by this gene displays chemotactic activity for lymphocytes and monocytes but not for neutrophils. This cytokine also shows a potent myelosuppressive activity and suppresses proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells. The expression of this gene is upregulated by IL-10.
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

How does pairing CCL16 ELISA with qPCR improve confidence compared with running only ELISA?

ELISA alone tells you how much CCL16 protein is present in the extracellular environment, but it may not reveal whether changes are driven by transcription, secretion, or protein stability. Adding qPCR gives you a second, mechanistically informative measurement that can confirm induction at the mRNA level or highlight post-transcriptional regulation. Reviewers often respond well to paired datasets because they strengthen causal interpretation and reduce the chance that a single-method artifact drives conclusions.

Can I use this kit to evaluate both early and late response phases after macrophage stimulation?

Yes, and that's a common use case. Early time points may show mRNA changes before protein accumulates, while later time points often reveal clearer secretion differences. We recommend selecting at least one early and one late time point, running matched ELISA and qPCR samples, and using consistent normalization rules. If you share your stimulation model and expected kinetics, we can suggest practical time points and sample handling to capture both phases effectively.

What if I have limited sample volume-how do I prioritize ELISA versus qPCR without losing interpretability?

If volume is limited, prioritize ELISA on supernatants because secretion is often your primary functional endpoint, then perform qPCR on a subset of key conditions or time points to validate mechanism. Another strategy is to pool replicates for qPCR when the goal is trend confirmation rather than precise quantification. We can help you design a minimal yet defensible sampling plan that preserves interpretability while respecting sample constraints.

  • Combined readout clarified timing differences between mRNA induction and secretion
    We observed that CCL16 transcription increased early after stimulation, but protein secretion rose more gradually. Having both ELISA and qPCR in a coordinated workflow helped us explain these kinetics rather than treating them as inconsistencies. The final dataset was stronger and easier to present. With proper planning for sample collection, the workflow was manageable and reproducible, and it reduced the need for additional follow-up experiments.
  • Efficient way to screen conditions and then validate mechanism on selected hits
    We ran ELISA across a panel of conditions to identify hits, then used qPCR to validate whether regulation was transcriptional. This approach saved time and improved confidence in our choices. The ELISA readout was stable once dilution was standardized, and qPCR results provided the extra layer of explanation we needed. Overall, it supported a clean pipeline from screening to mechanistic validation.
  • Good guidance on designing controls and reducing run-to-run variability
    The vendor's recommendations-especially adding a pooled reference sample and setting acceptance criteria-helped us reduce variability across plates and days. That was important because our study ran for several weeks. The combined ELISA + qPCR concept also improved internal decision-making because we could distinguish secretion effects from transcription effects. If you're doing macrophage chemokine profiling seriously, this format is worth considering.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.