Online Inquiry
  •  

Macrophage Chemokine Ligand 9 (CCL9) Competition ELISA Kit (MTS-1123-HM32)

Overview

Description
Creative Biolabs provides competition ELISA kit for quantitative measurement of Chemokine Ligand 9 (CCL9) in different sample types by colorimetric.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Detection Method
Colorimetric
Method Type
Competition ELISA
Analytical Method
Quantitative
Sample Type
Cell Culture Supernatant, Plasma, Serum, Tissue Homogenate
Specificity
Chemokine Ligand 9 (CCL9)

Specification

Size
96 tests
Sample Volume
100 μL
Assay Time
1.5 h
Plate
Pre-coated
Bioassay Target Name
Chemokine Ligand 9 (CCL9)
Storage
4 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Expiry Date
6 months
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.

Target Details

Full Name
C-C motif chemokine ligand 9
Synonyms
CCF18; MRP-2; Scya9; Scya10
Background
Predicted to enable CCR1 chemokine receptor binding activity; chemoattractant activity; and chemokine activity. Acts upstream of or within negative regulation of myoblast differentiation. Predicted to be located in extracellular region. Predicted to be active in extracellular space. Is expressed in several structures, including alimentary system; brain; eye; genitourinary system; and limb. Orthologous to several human genes including CCL23 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 23).
Sub Cat Reactivity Sensitivity Detection Range  
MTS-1123-HM291 Rat 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM292 Human 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

When should I choose a competition ELISA for CCL9 instead of a sandwich ELISA?

A competition ELISA can be useful when sample characteristics or target availability make competitive binding advantageous, and this product is described as a competition ELISA kit for quantitative measurement of CCL9 with a colorimetric readout. In practice, many users choose competition formats when they want an alternative assay design or when sample matrices are challenging. We still recommend a pilot dilution series, because competitive formats can behave differently across matrices.

Does the competitive format make it harder to interpret results?

Competitive assays are often interpreted inversely (signal decreases as analyte increases), so it's important to pay close attention to the standard curve direction and ensure consistent plate handling. Once you get used to the curve shape, it becomes very manageable. We suggest plotting standards immediately after the read and confirming that controls land where you expect. This reduces the risk of accidental misinterpretation and helps ensure your quantitative reporting is defensible.

How can I improve precision with a competition ELISA when my samples have borderline signals?

For borderline signals, precision improves most with (1) duplicate or triplicate wells, (2) careful pipetting technique, and (3) selecting a dilution that places readings near the most sensitive part of the curve. Because competitive ELISAs can have different sensitivity zones than sandwich assays, the "best" dilution is sometimes not the one you'd expect. Running two dilutions per sample in the first experiment is an efficient way to lock in the right range.

  • Competitive format worked well for our tricky matrix and reduced background issues
    We had a matrix that gave us higher background in other immunoassays, so we tried this CCL9 competition ELISA. After a short optimization, the standard curve behaved consistently and our samples separated nicely between conditions. Interpreting the inverse curve took one run to get comfortable with, but after that it was routine. For labs dealing with challenging samples, this competitive approach can be a useful alternative.
  • Good quantitative trend detection once we standardized plate timing and mixing
    The biggest factor for us was consistency: same incubation timing, thorough but gentle mixing, and strict duplicate handling. Once we did that, the competition ELISA gave reproducible quantitative patterns between treatment groups. We used it mainly for comparing cohorts rather than chasing tiny differences, and it performed well. If you're new to competitive assays, budget one pilot plate to find the best dilution range.
  • Solid CCL9 assay option when you specifically want a competitive ELISA design
    We selected this kit because we wanted a competitive ELISA format for CCL9 to complement our sandwich assays for other targets. It integrated well into our workflow and the colorimetric detection was straightforward on a standard plate reader. The data quality improved when we included a consistent reference sample across plates. Overall, it's a dependable choice if you have a reason to prefer competition-based quantification.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.