Online Inquiry
  •  

Macrophage Chemokine Ligand 4 (CCL4) Competition ELISA Kit (MTS-1123-HM18)

Overview

Description
Creative Biolabs provides competition ELISA kit for quantitative measurement of Chemokine Ligand 4 (CCL4) in different sample types by colorimetric.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Detection Method
Colorimetric
Method Type
Competition ELISA
Analytical Method
Quantitative
Sample Type
Cell Culture Supernatant, Plasma, Serum, Tissue Homogenate
Specificity
Chemokine Ligand 4 (CCL4)

Specification

Size
96 tests
Sample Volume
100 μL
Assay Time
1.5 h
Plate
Pre-coated
Bioassay Target Name
Chemokine Ligand 4 (CCL4)
Storage
4 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Expiry Date
6 months
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.

Target Details

Full Name
C-C motif chemokine ligand 4
Synonyms
ACT2; G-26; HC21; LAG1; LAG-1; MIP1B; SCYA2; SCYA4; MIP1B1; AT744.1; MIP-1-beta
Background
The protein encoded by this gene is a mitogen-inducible monokine and is one of the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T-cells. The encoded protein is secreted and has chemokinetic and inflammatory functions.
Sub Cat Reactivity Sensitivity Detection Range  
MTS-1123-HM197 Rabbit 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM198 Mouse 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM199 Dog 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM200 Cow User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM201 Goat User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM202 Chicken User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM203 Sheep User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM204 Guinea Pig 50-1000 pg/mL Inquiry
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

We want a faster assay for CCL4 and noticed this competitive kit is listed at 1.5 hours. Is the shorter time mainly due to fewer incubations, and does it compromise data quality?

The competitive kit is designed with a shorter overall assay time (listed at about 1.5 hours) and is often chosen when labs need faster turnaround. Faster does not automatically mean lower quality-what matters most is disciplined execution: accurate pipetting, consistent timing, and proper mixing. Competitive formats can be very robust when run correctly, but the curve is typically inverse and can be more sensitive to small handling differences. If your priority is speed plus consistency, we recommend running a pilot to confirm curve stability and including a fixed internal control sample on every plate to track performance.

Can we quantify CCL4 in tissue homogenates with this competitive kit without excessive background?

Yes, tissue homogenate is listed among compatible sample types, and many users successfully quantify chemokines in homogenates with competitive formats. The practical success factors are (1) strong clarification (centrifugation to remove particulates), (2) selecting a dilution that reduces matrix interference, and (3) confirming that dilution produces a linear response. If background is high, it often reflects residual debris, lipid content, or insufficient dilution rather than the assay format itself. We recommend spike-recovery checks during setup so you can confirm that the matrix is not suppressing or inflating the apparent CCL4 concentration.

We need to compare CCL4 across different sample types (supernatant vs serum). Should we use the same dilution factor for everything?

Using a single dilution factor across very different matrices can be risky because each matrix has different protein composition and potential interferents. Instead, treat each sample type as its own optimized condition: determine an appropriate dilution for supernatants, and separately determine an appropriate dilution for serum/plasma. Then maintain that dilution consistently within each cohort and include matrix-matched controls. You can still compare biological trends across matrices, but do so cautiously, and avoid assuming that identical dilution implies identical matrix behavior. A short pilot with dilution linearity testing is usually the fastest path to defensible comparisons.

  • Very efficient competitive kit that fit our tight screening schedule
    We selected the CCL4 competitive ELISA because we needed faster turnaround than our usual assays. The shorter run time helped us process more plates per week. The only "cost" is that staff must be comfortable with competitive curve interpretation. Once we standardized the layout and used the same internal control each plate, results were consistent. For supernatants, dilution was straightforward; for serum, we needed a quick pilot to find the right dilution. Overall, excellent for throughput-focused studies.
  • Good for tissue homogenates after careful clarification and consistent dilution choice
    Our samples were inflamed tissue homogenates where background can be a challenge. This kit worked well once we clarified aggressively and avoided loading cloudy material. We also found that running two dilutions initially helped reveal matrix interference early. After optimization, replicate agreement was strong and the curve stayed stable. The shorter assay time was a bonus because homogenate prep already takes time; finishing the ELISA faster made the entire workflow more manageable.
  • Solid results, but precision pipetting is mandatory for competitive assays
    The data quality we got was good, but the kit rewards careful technique. Competitive assays can punish sloppy pipetting because the curve shape is sensitive to small deviations. Once we switched to calibrated pipettes and consistent multichannel technique, variability dropped noticeably. We liked the pre-coated plate format and the fast runtime. If your lab has good plate discipline, this kit is a strong option for CCL4 quantification across common matrices.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.