Online Inquiry
  •  

Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Protein 2 (NRAMP2) ELISA Kit (MTS-1123-HM123)

Overview

Description
This product is designed to detect native, not recombinant, NRAMP2. Appropriate sample types may include undiluted body fluids and/or tissue homogenates, secretions.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Detection Method
Colorimetric
Sample Type
Undiluted Body Fluids, Tissue Homogenates, Secretions
Specificity
Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Protein 2

Specification

Size
96 tests
Bioassay Target Name
Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Protein 2
Storage
2-8 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.
Sub Cat Reactivity Sensitivity Detection Range  
MTS-1123-HM792 Rat User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM793 Human User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM794 Mouse User optimized Inquiry
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

I see there are options for different species. How do I choose the right reactivity, and what should I do if I'm working with an uncommon matrix like tissue lysate?

This NRAMP2 ELISA kit is listed with multiple reactivity options, including Rat, Human, and Mouse variants. First, match the kit to your target species to ensure antibody compatibility. For uncommon matrices (tissue lysates, iron-rich samples, or detergent-containing buffers), we recommend a pilot optimization: test a small set of buffer compositions and run serial dilutions to assess linearity and recovery. If your lysate contains strong detergents, consider diluting further or using a milder lysis buffer to reduce assay interference. Including spike-in recovery controls is a practical way to confirm that your matrix is not suppressing the signal.

NRAMP2 is linked to metal transport and macrophage biology. Any practical tips for avoiding artifacts when samples come from inflammation models with high oxidative stress?

In oxidative or inflammatory models, sample composition can change dramatically (protease activity, hemolysis risk, and altered total protein), which may introduce variability unrelated to true NRAMP2 abundance. Practical steps include adding protease inhibitors for lysates, clarifying samples by centrifugation, normalizing input by total protein for lysates, and avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles. If comparing conditions that differ in cell death, include viability/cell count normalization or a housekeeping protein to interpret whether changes reflect expression shifts versus cellular composition. Running matched controls and spike-recovery checks can help confirm that the observed differences reflect biology, not matrix-driven assay artifacts.

The listing mentions "user optimized" for sensitivity and detection range. What does that mean for my experimental planning and data interpretation?

"User optimized" indicates that sensitivity and detection range are intended to be optimized by the user depending on sample type, preparation, and expected abundance, rather than a single universal performance window being fixed for all matrices. In planning, that means you should allocate a short pre-study to establish the working dilution range, confirm standard curve behavior in your hands, and estimate intra-/inter-assay precision using replicates. For interpretation, focus on relative differences within a controlled experiment (matched handling and timing) until you confirm absolute quantitation suitability for your matrix. Once optimized, document dilution factors and acceptance criteria so later runs remain comparable.

  • Flexible species options made cross-model NRAMP2 comparisons easier
    We work across mouse and human macrophage systems, so having species-specific options was important. The main effort was upfront optimization: we ran a dilution series and tested two lysis buffers to get clean linearity. After that, the assay produced stable trends that matched our expectations from iron-handling perturbations. We treated it as semi-quantitative initially, then tightened our SOP and controls as we gained confidence. For teams studying metal transport pathways in macrophage contexts, it's a useful tool as long as you plan time for matrix-specific setup.
  • Worth it for challenging lysates after careful pilot optimization steps
    Our samples were inflammatory tissue lysates, which can be messy. The "user optimized" nature forced us to do a proper pilot-spike recovery, serial dilutions, and careful protein normalization. Once optimized, we could compare conditions reliably and the data aligned with our transcript and phenotype observations. The biggest lesson was to avoid over-interpreting single-point results before establishing dilution linearity. After implementing an internal QC sample on every plate, we felt comfortable using it for repeated studies and time-course comparisons.
  • Good signal consistency when paired with strong sample-handling discipline
    We used the NRAMP2 kit in macrophage cultures under oxidative stress and learned that sample handling matters as much as the assay. With protease inhibitors, consistent lysis timing, and clarified lysates, the results were consistent. The optimization requirement wasn't a drawback for us-it actually encouraged better assay discipline and documentation, which improved reproducibility in later runs. Once our SOP stabilized, the kit delivered interpretable trends and helped support a mechanistic figure in our study. Recommended if you're willing to do the pilot work properly.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.