Online Inquiry
  •  

Macrophage Mannose Receptor 1 (MRC1) ELISA Kit, qPCR (MTS-1123-HM2)

Overview

Description
Creative Biolabs provides sandwich ELISA kit for semi-quantitative measurement of Mannose Receptor C Type 1 (MRC1) in different sample types by qPCR.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Reactivity
Human
Detection Method
qPCR
Method Type
Sandwich ELISA
Analytical Method
Semi-Quantitative
Sensitivity
0.041 ng/mL
Sample Type
Cell Culture Supernatant, Cell Lysate, Plasma, Serum
Specificity
Mannose Receptor C Type 1 (MRC1)

Specification

Size
96 tests
Sample Volume
25 µL
Plate
Pre-coated
Bioassay Target Name
Mannose Receptor C Type 1 (MRC1)
Storage
4 °C, -20 °C, -80 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Expiry Date
6 months
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.

Target Details

Full Name
mannose receptor C-type 1
Synonyms
MMR; hMR; CD206; MRC1L1; CLEC13D; CLEC13DL; bA541I19.1
Background
The protein encoded by this gene is a type I membrane receptor that mediates the endocytosis of glycoproteins by macrophages. The protein has been shown to bind high-mannose structures on the surface of potentially pathogenic viruses, bacteria, and fungi so that they can be neutralized by phagocytic engulfment.
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

The page says "ELISA kit, qPCR" and "semi-quantitative." What exactly is being measured, and how should I interpret results versus a classic absorbance ELISA?

This product is presented as a sandwich ELISA workflow with a qPCR-based readout and is described as semi-quantitative on the page. Practically, you should interpret results as relative or comparative signals rather than absolute concentrations unless your experimental design includes appropriate calibrators and controls. We recommend running consistent reference samples across runs and focusing on fold-changes between conditions, especially when comparing treatment groups or time courses.

I'm choosing between the colorimetric MRC1 ELISA and the qPCR format. When is the qPCR format the better choice?

If your primary need is robust absolute quantification using standard plate readers, the colorimetric ELISA is typically the simplest route. The qPCR readout can be attractive when sample volume is limited or when you prefer a nucleic-acid amplification-style detection step in your lab workflow. Because this format is labeled semi-quantitative, it's best suited for comparing groups under matched conditions rather than building cross-study concentration benchmarks.

What controls do you recommend to ensure qPCR-based detection isn't biased by inhibitors from my sample matrix?

Matrix inhibitors can affect downstream amplification-like steps, so controls are essential. We suggest including a no-sample control, a matrix blank (your sample buffer without analyte), and spike-in recovery in representative sample types. If you see suppression, dilute the sample and confirm that the observed signal changes proportionally (parallelism). Keeping sample processing consistent and avoiding carryover of harsh lysis reagents will help maintain reliable semi-quantitative comparisons.

  • Useful semi-quantitative MRC1 comparisons when absolute numbers aren't required
    We selected the qPCR-format MRC1 kit because our team is comfortable with qPCR workflows and we mainly needed relative differences across stimulation conditions. After adding matrix blanks and spike recovery controls, the results were consistent and directionally matched our flow cytometry CD206 trends. I wouldn't use it to claim absolute concentrations across unrelated studies, but for within-project comparisons, it delivered reproducible fold-change patterns.
  • Works well with careful inhibitor control and standardized processing steps
    Our first run showed weaker signals in tissue homogenate samples, which we traced to matrix inhibition. Diluting samples and standardizing the extraction method improved parallelism and reduced variability. Once optimized, the kit produced stable semi-quantitative readouts across multiple days. The documentation helped us decide on control placement and reinforced the idea of using a pooled reference sample to compare runs.
  • A practical option for labs set up for qPCR-based detection
    If your lab infrastructure is better for qPCR than absorbance plate reading, this kit can fit nicely. We implemented it for macrophage polarization experiments and found the workflow manageable. The key is to treat it as semi-quantitative and design the experiment accordingly: matched sample matrices, consistent processing, and internal references. With those in place, we got clean separation between M2-skewing and control conditions.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.