Online Inquiry
  •  

Monocyte To Macrophage Differentiation Associated Protein (MMA) ELISA Kit, Colorimetric (MTS-1123-HM11)

Overview

Description
Creative Biolabs provides sandwich ELISA kit for quantitative measurement of Monocyte to Macrophage Differentiation Associated Protein (MMA) in different sample types by colorimetric.
Applications
ELISA
Qualified With
Quality Certificate
Detection Method
Colorimetric
Method Type
Sandwich ELISA
Analytical Method
Quantitative
Sample Type
Cell Lysate, Tissue Homogenate
Specificity
Monocyte To Macrophage Differentiation Associated Protein (MMA)

Specification

Size
96 tests
Sample Volume
100 μL
Assay Time
3 h
Plate
Pre-coated
Bioassay Target Name
Monocyte To Macrophage Differentiation Associated Protein (MMA)
Storage
4 °C, -20 °C
Storage Comment
Reference to the protocol
Expiry Date
6 months
Product Disclaimer
This product is provided for research only, not suitable for human or animal use.

Target Details

Full Name
monocyte to macrophage differentiation associated
Synonyms
MMD; MMD1; PAQR11
Background
This protein is expressed by in vitro differentiated macrophages but not freshly isolated monocytes. Although sequence analysis identifies seven potential transmembrane domains, this protein has little homology to G-protein receptors and it has not been positively identified as a receptor. A suggested alternative function is that of an ion channel protein in maturing macrophages.
Sub Cat Reactivity Sensitivity Detection Range  
MTS-1123-HM161 Human 0.15 ng/mL-10 ng/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM162 Various Species 0.312-20 ng/mL Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM163 Human, Mouse, Rat User optimized Inquiry
MTS-1123-HM164 Cow User optimized Inquiry
FAQs Customer Reviews Related Products

I want to use MMA as a differentiation marker. Should I measure MMA in lysates or supernatants, and how can I design a convincing differentiation experiment?

For differentiation-associated proteins, lysates are often the most direct choice, though suitability depends on where the protein is enriched in your system. A convincing design includes a time-course (multiple days), consistent normalization by total protein, and at least one orthogonal marker (e.g., CD14 decrease, CD68 increase, or functional assays). Using this quantitative colorimetric sandwich ELISA, you can quantify MMA alongside other markers to support a coherent differentiation story.

Can I compare MMA across different monocyte sources (PBMC donors vs cell lines), or will matrix differences dominate?

You can compare, but you should expect matrix and baseline expression differences. We recommend keeping sample preparation aligned, normalizing by total protein, and confirming dilution parallelism for each source. A strong approach is to analyze fold-change from each source's baseline rather than comparing raw values directly. Including a shared reference sample can help link plates and reduce confounding from inter-source variability.

What's your guidance if my differentiation samples show high variability even in technical duplicates?

First check technical factors: pipetting accuracy, plate washing consistency, and whether samples were well mixed and clarified. Then evaluate biological sources of variability: uneven differentiation efficiency, donor variability, or inconsistent cell density. Running triplicates for key samples and including an internal control lysate across plates can separate technical noise from biology. If variability persists, consider tightening cell culture timing and using standardized differentiation protocols to reduce batch effects.

  • Strong differentiation-associated signal when paired with a time-course design
    We used the MMA kit to track monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and ran samples across several timepoints. The assay produced clear trends once we normalized by total protein and used the same lysis buffer throughout. We paired MMA with a small marker panel and the results aligned well. It's a straightforward colorimetric ELISA that integrates easily into standard workflows and helped quantify differentiation progression objectively.
  • Good reproducibility after tightening cell culture and sample processing steps
    Our initial variability was mostly biological-differentiation efficiency varied with cell density and media changes. Once we standardized the culture schedule and clarified lysates consistently, the ELISA became much more repeatable. The protocol is easy to follow and the readout is stable on a standard plate reader. It's useful for comparing differentiation conditions and for validating that a protocol change truly shifts macrophage maturation.
  • Practical quantitative marker assay that benefits from internal reference controls
    We ran multiple plates across donors and found that including a pooled reference lysate was essential for cross-plate comparisons. After implementing that, the kit provided consistent quantitative output and helped us compare differentiation protocols head-to-head. The colorimetric format is convenient and fast for routine work. I'd recommend a pilot dilution series, especially with donor samples, to keep everything in the linear range.

For Research Use Only. Do Not Use in Food Manufacturing or Medical Procedures (Diagnostics or Therapeutics). Do Not Use in Humans.

CONTACT US
()
()
()
ADDRESS


> Global

ISO 9001 Certified - Creative Biolabs Quality Management System.

Copyright © 2026 Creative Biolabs. All Rights Reserved.